A utilização do ENADE como métrica de qualidade dos cursos de ensino superior

Resumo

To analyze the score of institutions on ENADE (National Exam of Student Performance) as a measure of quality, some methodologies are applied considering three periods of evaluation on courses of administration, economic sciences, accounting sciences and engineering universities. The results indicate that small institutions present greater variability of scores in general education and specific knowledge. Additionally, the score variation from one period to the next is more intense, positively or negatively, in the small institutions. A significant share of the score variation from one period to the next is attributed to non-persistent factors, which are elements not managed by the institutions and which tend to be reverted in the next period. The institutions that are in a better position in the ranking have greater probability to continue well ranked, and this scenario is more intense for private institutions. On the other hand, the other institutions have a low probability to keep their rank positions, which can get better or worse. The socioeconomic questionnaire of ENADE, which is responsible to capture the students’ perception and makes up 15% of the CPC (Preliminary Course Concept) indicator, showed to be inefficient as a measure of the institution quality, since 48% of total questions are negatively correlated with the scores.

Ficha do documento

Tipo

Dissertação

Ano

2018

Instituição

Fundação Getulio Vargas

Fonte

Repositório da FGV

Idioma

Português

Acesso

Acesso aberto

Identificador

oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/20273

Temas

EconomiaEducação

Palavras-chave

RankingPredictabilityHigher educationENADEPrevisibilidadeEnsino superiorEconomiaAvaliação educacional - BrasilUniversidades e faculdades - Avaliação - BrasilEnsino superior - Avaliação - Brasil