Supremo interesseprotagonismo político-regulatório e a evolução institucional do processo de seleção dos ministros do STF
Jorge, Álvaro Amaral de França Couto Palma de
O documento é disponibilizado pela fonte de origem, que mantém a versão integral e as condições de uso.
Resumo
Based on the fact that higher courts are assuming a greater role in Brazil today, as is the global trend in complex contemporary societies, in the shaping of public policy and regulation, the study aims to map the evolution – and progressive democratization – of the checks and balances structure established in the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, i.e., the selection process of justice for Federal Supreme Court, Brazil’s apex constitutional court. The text analyses the institutional/constitutional framework of the selection process for new justices, and exemplify changes in the profile of political players, in the network of competences of institutions involved in the process and in the social, political, economic and cultural context that pushed through the practical transformation of the institutional selection model without altering, however, the format originally established in the 19th Century. By mapping the origin and evolution of the constitutional formula for collaboration between the Executive and Legislative branches in choosing the members of the Judiciary’s highest court, the study finds the origin of the Brazilian model in the US experience, describing the latter and making parallels between the two. Taking the 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil as a milestone, the work demonstrates the even greater mobilization of political and social players concerning the selection process, especially in relation to the hearings and confirmation of appointments for the Federal Supreme Court by the Federal Senate Constitution, Justice and Civic Rights Commission (CCJ). Finally, the studies analyzes actual CCJ hearing sessions and some of the main discussions therein so as to draw lessons that may guide the debate on the evolution of the selection process of justices to the Federal Supreme Court , including as an early control tool used by those involved in the creation of future public policy through Federal Supreme Court decisions.
Ficha do documento
- Tipo
- Dissertação
- Ano
- 2016
- Instituição
- Fundação Getulio Vargas
- Fonte
- Repositório da FGV
- Idioma
- Português
- Acesso
- Acesso aberto
- Identificador
- oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/16202
- Temas
- Políticas Públicas
- Palavras-chave
- JusticesSupreme CourtConstitution. Federal SenateConfirmation hearingsFederal Senate ConstitutionJustice and civic rights commissionSelectionInstitutional frameworkChecks and balancesDemocratizationRegulationPublic policyFederal SenateRegulaçãoDemocratizaçãoFreios e contrapesosMoldura institucionalMinistrosSupremo Tribunal FederalConstituiçãoComissão de ConstituiçãoComissão de constituição, justiça e cidadania do Senado FederalPolíticas públicasDireitoMinistros do Supremo Tribunal - RecrutamentoBrasil. Congresso Nacional. Senado Federal. Comissão de Constituição, Justiça e Cidadania
Conteúdos relacionados
- DissertaçãoDo planejamento à governança no fomento público financeiroFundação Getulio Vargas · 2018
- DissertaçãoPunição, recompensa, persuasão e ajudaFundação Getulio Vargas · 2012
- Artigo científicoSocial participation in 20 years of the regulatory process of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa)Escola Nacional de Administração Pública - Enap · 2024
- DissertaçãoUm modelo prospectivo da primeira biblioteca digital escolar do município do Rio de JaneiroFundação Getulio Vargas · 2023