O impacto da jurisprudência da corte internacional de justiça em cortes de direitos humanosdiálogo judicial ou monólogo com a corte interamericana de direitos humanos?

Resumo

This contribution particularly evaluatesthe use of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) jurisprudence in the case law of theInter-American Court on Human Rights (IACtHR).It intendsto identify whether, for what purpose, and to what extent the IACtHR takes into account the jurisprudence of the ICJ.This article is divided into two parts and applies quantitative and qualitativemethods. The first section evaluatesasymmetries and particular features that characterize thejudicial dialogue between the ICJ and the IACtHR. Being aware that the ICJ and the IACtHR are placed in different levels and possess structural differences, thesecond part presentsan empirical analysis of the most cited ICJ rulings in both IACtHR’s contentious and advisory proceedings.Ultimately, this analysis aims to identify the existence of a dialogue or a monologue between the IACtHR and the ICJ.

Ficha do documento

Tipo

Artigo científico

Ano

2021

Instituição

Fundação Getulio Vargas

Fonte

Repositório da FGV

Idioma

Inglês

Acesso

Acesso aberto

Identificador

oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/37759

Palavras-chave

Judicial dialogueInter-american court of human rightsInternational court of justiceEmpirical analysisCross-fertilizationDiálogo JudicialCorte Interamericana de Direitos HumanosCorte Internacional de JustiçaAnálise empíricaFertilização cruzadaDireito