O Tribunal de Contas da União e a prescrição da pretensão ressarcitória
Rego, Aline Paim Monteiro do
O documento é disponibilizado pela fonte de origem, que mantém a versão integral e as condições de uso.
Resumo
The purpose of this study is to identify which prescription principal of law must be applied by the TCU in pursuit of public treasury loss. The subject is not regulated by federal law, allowing both STF and TCU to act as protagonists in defining its legal contours. Therefore, the study at hand seeks to analyze, using empirical methods, jurisprudence created and used by these institutions, in order to define the applicable legal regime. The study demonstrates how the STF radically changed its stance, previously defending the imprescriptibility of damage to the public treasury, to recognizing that the claims regarding reimbursement of public accounts is also subjected to prescription. In order to monitor the STF's jurisprudence, recently, after intense debates, the TCU published the resolution n° 344, of October 11, 2022, to regulate prescription within the scope of that Court. However, to this date, the prescription of public accounts has not yet been regulated by law, a necessary measure as it is subjected to legal reserve. As a result of the lack of a legal standard, the STF established the application, by analogy, of Federal Law 9.873/99 to the external control process. However, the research revealed that by applying this legal diploma, which does not consider the particularities of public account control, in addition to the oscillations in the STF's interpretation on fluency and interruption of prescription, may have created a scenario of legal uncertainty for control actors. Thus, at the end of this academic work, recommendations for future conducts are proposed, directed at the Legislative Branch, the STF and the TCU, in order to guide the creation of a legal regime that regulates, with clarity, stability and security, the prescription of damage to the public treasury applicable to the TCU.
Ficha do documento
- Tipo
- Dissertação
- Ano
- 2024
- Instituição
- Fundação Getulio Vargas
- Fonte
- Repositório da FGV
- Idioma
- Português
- Acesso
- Acesso aberto
- Identificador
- oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/35419
- Palavras-chave
- PrescriçãoDano ao erárioPrecedentesSupremo Tribunal FederalTribunal de Contas da UniãoStatue of limitationPrescriptionDamage to the treasuryPrecedentsSupreme CourtFederal Court of AccountsDireitoPrescrição (Direito administrativo)Precedentes judiciaisDanos (Direito)Brasil. Supremo Tribunal FederalBrasil. Tribunal de Contas da União
Conteúdos relacionados
- DissertaçãoNegociação de ressarcimento de dano patrimonial ao erário na Lei Anticorrupção e na Lei ImprobidadeFundação Getulio Vargas · 2026
- DissertaçãoControle do Tribunal de Contas da União pelo Supremo Tribunal FederalFundação Getulio Vargas · 2020
- DissertaçãoComo se controla o fomento à cultura? Um estudo jurisprudencial da Lei Rouanet no TCUFundação Getulio Vargas · 2022
- DissertaçãoA aplicação do artigo 24 da LINDB e a revisão da validade das deliberações administrativas do Estado de São PauloFundação Getulio Vargas · 2020