Os dois métodos da teoria econômica
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
O documento é disponibilizado pela fonte de origem, que mantém a versão integral e as condições de uso.
Resumo
Economic theory deals with a complex reality, which may be seen through various perspectives, using different methods. Economics’ three major branches – development economics, macroeconomics, and microeconomics – cannot be unified because the former two use preferentially a historical-deductive, while the later, an essentially hypothetical-deductive or aprioristic method. Smith, Marx and Keynes used an essentially the method of the new historical facts, while Walras, an aprioristic one to devise the neoclassical general equilibrium model. The historical-deductive method looks for the new historical facts that condition the economic reality. Economic theory remains central, but it is more modest, or less general, as the economist that adopt principally this method is content to analyze stabilization and growth in the framework of a given historical phase or moment of the economic process. As a trade off, his models are more realistic and conducive to more effective economic policies, as long as he is not required to previously abandon, one by one, the unrealistic assumptions required by a excessively general theory, but already starts from more realistic ones
Ficha do documento
- Tipo
- Estudo
- Ano
- 2003
- Instituição
- Fundação Getulio Vargas
- Fonte
- Repositório da FGV
- Idioma
- Português
- Acesso
- Não informado
- Identificador
- oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/1941
- Temas
- Economia
Conteúdos relacionados
- EstudoThe relative autonomy of macroeconomicsFundação Getulio Vargas · 1996
- EstudoA retórica na economia institucional de Douglas NorthFundação Getulio Vargas · 2002
- EstudoFragments of a transepistemic discourse, political economy of scientific knowledge and sociology of economic knowledgeFundação Getulio Vargas · 1994
- EstudoThe determination of the exchange rateEscola de Economia de São Paulo · 2022