Condemning corruption while condoning inefficiencyan experimental investigation into voting behavior
Arvate, Paulo Roberto; Souza, Sergio Mittlaender Leme de
O documento é disponibilizado pela fonte de origem, que mantém a versão integral e as condições de uso.
Resumo
This article reports results from an economic experiment that investigates to what extent voters punish corruption and waste in elections. While both are responsible for a loss of welfare for voters, they are not necessarily perceived as equally immoral. The empirical literature in political agency has not yet dealt with these two dimensions that determine voters’ choices. Our results suggest that morality and norms are indeed crucial for a superior voting equilibrium in systems with heterogeneous politicians: while corruption is always punished, self-interest alone – in the absence of norms – leads to the acceptance and perpetuation of waste and social losses.
Ficha do documento
- Tipo
- Outro
- Ano
- 2016
- Instituição
- EAESP - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo
- Fonte
- Repositório da FGV
- Idioma
- Inglês
- Acesso
- Não informado
- Identificador
- oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/17777
- Temas
- Governança
Conteúdos relacionados
- Artigo científicoWhy do voters choose corrupt candidates? The role of ideology on cognitive mechanismsFundação Getulio Vargas · 2020
- DissertaçãoPor que as investigações morremFundação Getulio Vargas · 2026
- DissertaçãoO caso PetrobrasFundação Getulio Vargas · 2024
- DissertaçãoReformas eleitorais no Brasil (2015 - 2021)Fundação Getulio Vargas · 2023