After structuralism, a development alternative for Latin America
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
O documento é disponibilizado pela fonte de origem, que mantém a versão integral e as condições de uso.
Resumo
The paper, first, summarizes Latin American structuralism, and offers reasons why it was so influential and durable in the region, as it attended to real demands, and was part of 1950s’mainstream economics. Second, says why, with 1980s’Great Crisis, structuralism eventually ended itself into crisis, as it was unable to keep pace with historical new facts, particularly with the industrial revolution or takeoff, that made Latin American economies intermediary, still developing, but fully capitalist. Third, it lists the consensus that today exists on economic development. Forth, opposes 'official orthodoxy' to 'developmental populism', the former deriving from neoclassical economics, the later from structuralism, and offers, in relation to six strategic issues, a progressive development alternative.
Ficha do documento
- Tipo
- Estudo
- Ano
- 2000
- Instituição
- Fundação Getulio Vargas
- Fonte
- Repositório da FGV
- Idioma
- Inglês
- Acesso
- Acesso aberto
- Identificador
- oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/1899
Conteúdos relacionados
- EstudoDo antigo ao novo desenvolvimentismo na América LatinaEscola de Economia de São Paulo · 2010
- EstudoMacroeconomia estruturalista do desenvolvimentoEscola de Economia de São Paulo · 2010
- Artigo científicoMacroeconomics of stagnation and new developmentalism in Latin AmericaPalgrave · 2008
- Artigo científicoMéxico lidera a melhora no Clima Econômico da América LatinaFGV IBRE, FGV DINT · 2023
